Don't tell us 'you can't'
By ALFRED P. DOBLIN, NorthJersey.com,
February 16, 2006
| |
 |
| |
BETH
BALBIERZ / THE RECORD
Cynthia
Vandenberg and David Henderson, both of Trenton,
joined the rally in support of same-sex marriage
outside the Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex in
Trenton. Vandenberg held her her 14-month-old
daughter, whose biological father is Henderson's
partner. |
The state Supreme Court Wednesday heard
arguments on whether gays should be allowed to marry in New
Jersey. As surely as the case will shape law, it will
change lives, including the lives of the seven couples suing the
state. Today, columnist Alfred Doblin profiles one of the
couples, the fifth in a series of seven.
It could have been a sketch on "Seinfeld." It's the
clerk's first day on the job and she is eager to please.
Two women walk in seeking a license to marry -- each other.
On "Seinfeld," the scene would end: "No soup for you."
In real life: "No form for you."
Suyin Lael, and her partner Sarah, plaintiffs in the same-sex
marriage lawsuit, applied for the license. The clerk
handed them a form to fill out. "We looked at this and it
said 'man and woman,' " Sarah said. They pointed out the
obvious to the clerk: woman and woman.
"I think she realized she was getting in over her head and said
that she had to wait for her supervisor," Sarah said. With
their $20 check and their witness, they waited in the lobby for
40 minutes. The supervisor arrived and said, 'There is no
form for you.' "
That rejection made their wish to be married all the more
intense. "It was having someone say, 'You can't,'" Suyin
said. Each of the seven same-sex couples in the lawsuit
encountered a similar rejection.
Oral arguments were made Wednesday before the state Supreme
Court, whose decision will be final; no appeals. "You
can't" is not an acceptable conclusion for Suyin and Sarah.
They live in Dayton in a rural section of Middlesex County.
With three children and a dog, they represent the antithesis of
what the religious right would depict as the "gay lifestyle."
For Suyin and Sarah, who legally changed their last names to
Lael (it was Suyin's middle name), the only lifestyle they
embrace is family.
If being a lesbian couple was not challenge enough, Sarah, a
speech therapist, and Suyin, who works for a nonprofit
organization that deals with adults and children with special
needs, are an interracial couple. Their three adopted
children are black. The oldest, Zenzali, 8, was adopted
from Liberia. Siblings Tenaj, 6, and Danica, 5, were
adopted through the state Division of Youth and Family Services.
Suyin had to adopt Zenzali before she could be brought into the
United States, and then again in New Jersey. Sarah had to
separately adopt Zenzali. A married couple would have had
less paperwork, fewer costs and, most important, no fear that if
something happened to one of them during the separate adoption
processes, the other could lose custody of the child.
For their children, the lawsuit demonstrates that injustice must
be met by action. "It's really good for them to know that
when something isn't right, you take steps to challenge it, that
you don't comply with things that aren't right," Sarah said.
Tenaj and Danica's adoption went through after the women joined
the lawsuit. By then, lesbians adopting in New Jersey was
more accepted. Suyin and Sarah believe the lawsuit gave
them more stability in the eyes of DYFS. Sarah said, "If
anything, it was a slight plus because they knew we were
committed to each other and that we felt strongly by family."
That meant researching where to live and where to send their
children to school. It was not enough to find good
academic programs; it also was important to find environments
that welcome children with two moms.
"We have the same hopes and dreams for our family as anyone
else," Sarah Lael said. "Basically, at this point of our
lives, everything we do is for our children."
For the couple, the desire to be married was cumulative.
Waiting on line for a rental car, they might hear someone add
his spouse to the rental agreement at no extra cost. Suyin
not only had to pay more for Sarah, Sarah also was required to
be there to sign the agreement. A wife would not have had
to.
A wife would not have to explain to receptionists in doctors'
waiting rooms that she can sign medical forms for all their
children.
A wife can call an emergency room and get her spouse's condition
update.
A wife is not told: "You can't."
Both women feel that children need to see that same-sex parents
are not so unusual. They were upset by the controversy
last year over the PBS children's program "Postcards from
Buster." An episode depicting a group of parents,
including a lesbian couple, became the subject of controversy
after U.S. Education Secretary Margaret Spellings publicly
complained about the content. Many PBS stations pulled the
segment.
"I thought it was really sad that it wasn't aired widely because
I think it was something that was good for children to see,"
Suyin said. "The truth is that there are a lot of children
– and more every day – that have parents of the same sex.
And just by not airing a TV show doesn't mean that it doesn't
happen or it doesn't exist or your children aren't going to be
exposed to it."
"We really want to get married," Suyin said. "Domestic
partnership in New Jersey is kind of like a last-ditch effort.
It provides some rights, but it doesn't really do a lot for
you."
Sarah added, "It's just not the same thing. It's like
being offered a half measure to help other people feel
comfortable."
It's like two adults walking into a municipal clerk's office,
asking for a marriage license so they can legally wed and being
told, "You can't."
This is the fifth part of an eight-part series
on same-sex marriage in New Jersey. Alfred P. Doblin is
the editorial page editor of the Herald News. Reach him at
doblin@northjersey.com
|