
Paid family leave to be NJ reality
By HUGH R. MORLEY, STAFF WRITER,
NorthJersey.com, December 12, 2007
A key legislator told
business leaders Tuesday that the paid family leave bill they
fiercely oppose won't advance in its current form, but a version
will become law eventually.
Assembly Speaker Joseph J. Roberts said concerns about the
bill's proposed 10 weeks off, and possible fraud, were issues he
hopes to work with opponents to iron out.
Still, he said paid family leave, which has the endorsement of
Governor Corzine, "will become a reality at some point in New
Jersey."
Business owners are having none of it, however, in a bitter
battle that has pitted them against powerful lobbying efforts
from special-interest groups including the AARP, the National
Organization for Women and several unions.
"It is an issue that has galvanized the business community like
nothing else in the last few years," said Philip Kirschner,
president of the New Jersey Business and Industry Association.
"Because it goes to the guts of operating a business. You
just can't do it with people absent for a great period of time."
|
Family
leave bill |
|
Key aspects of the proposal in the
Legislature:
• Employees could take 10 weeks' paid time off to
care for a sick loved one, or a newborn or adopted
child.
• They would receive two-thirds of their wage, to a
maximum of $502 per week in 2007.
• The payments would come from a state-run fund into
which all employees would pay 0.1 percent of their
salary.
• Employers with fewer than 50 workers would not
have to rehire someone who takes paid family leave. |
Roberts spoke to more
than 300 business leaders gathered in Edison at the annual
public policy forum organized by the NJBIA, a Trenton-based
trade group.
Supporters say the bill, which would be funded through a payroll
tax, would give employees relief from pressure at work in a time
of family difficulty.
Business leaders call it "a legislative nightmare," an
ill-conceived, costly measure that would disrupt the workplace,
force them to hire replacement workers, and encourage fraud.
Roberts said that he will decide after a Democratic caucus on
Thursday whether the bill will be posted for a vote before the
legislative session ends in January, or not until the new
session convenes.
The forum came after several days in which the bill's supporters
steadily escalated their lobbying efforts.
Last week, the groups held a press conference denouncing the
opposition of the business community. Supporters displayed
hundreds of baby clothes bearing slogans such as "moms for moms"
and "invest in families" to symbolize the importance of the
issue to parents.
Corzine and Senate President Richard Codey both expressed
support for paid family leave at Tuesday's forum, suggesting
that the plan may not cause as much difficulty as the business
community fears.
Codey said that in California, the only state with a paid family
leave law, 85 percent of those who take it are pregnant women
who most likely would have taken the time off anyway.
"The California experience has not been a bad one," he said.
Corzine, the featured speaker at the event, said he and other
legislators who support the bill are willing to reduce the 10
weeks to six to appease the business community.
The governor, who nearly died in April when the SUV he was
riding in crashed on the Garden State Parkway, said the
accident, and the time his children spent at his bedside,
brought home to him the need to give families such time off.
Corzine also suggested the bill may benefit employers by
creating a friendly work environment that would attract talent.
But he surprised business leaders by saying that small
businesses could opt out of the proposal.
"My reading of the legislation is that they already have a
choice to opt in or not," he said, after the forum.
That runs counter to past statements by sponsor Sen. Steven
Sweeney, D-Gloucester, who has said small businesses are
included, in part because of the difficulty of removing some
employees from eligibility if they are all paying the payroll
tax.
Kirschner was taken aback by Corzine's comments. "There is
no opt-out provision," he said. "This bill applies to
every single business in the state, whether you have two or 50
or 500 or 2,000 [employees]."
However, the bill does not require employers with fewer than 50
workers to rehire someone who takes paid time off.
Supporters also reduced the time a worker can take off from 12
weeks in the initial bill to 10 weeks in the current version.
Roberts said he wants to see the bill rewritten to reduce the
possibility of abuse, with workers taking paid time when they
have no family medical situation.
Kirschner and other business leaders say the bill would force
companies to do without key employees and train temporary
workers. Kirschner said many employers already give
workers paid time off to care for loved ones, and a law
requiring it would burden them with restrictions.
Senate Republican leader Leonard Lance said he believes that
family-leave laws should be handled at the federal level.
"My concern with paid family leave in New Jersey is that it
would make us uncompetitive with states like Pennsylvania [in
attracting businesses]," he said.
|